Report
Estonia Monthly: Conscription Language Debate Reignites “Russophobia” Narratives
In December 2025, proposed language requirements for certain roles in Estonia’s conscription-based defence forces sparked renewed “Russophobia” narratives in Russian-language and pro-Kremlin online spaces. While critics framed the initiative as discriminatory toward Russian-speaking citizens, authorities emphasized operational safety, cohesion, and effective communication, highlighting ongoing tensions between integration, security, and minority rights.
Weekly Reports
Estonia Weekly: Satirical “Olivier Salad Ban” Rumour Fuels Russophobia
Pro-Kremlin online voices in Estonia amplified both fabricated claims about cultural repression and criticism of long queues at the Narva border, framing these measures as evidence of “Russophobia.”
Read more
Estonia Weekly: Ülemiste Explosion Sparks Disinformation Narratives
Reactions in Estonia to the decision to introduce a uniform 12-month conscription from 2027 were mixed, including fringe pro-Kremlin narratives that questioned conscription itself.
Read more
Estonia Weekly: Treason Conviction in Estonia Cast as “Russophobia” by Pro-Kremlin Voices
Pro-Kremlin online commentators spread messages about “political repression,” “Russophobia,” and a liberal culture war in Estonia allegedly aimed at silencing dissent and undermining traditional values.
Read more
Estonia Weekly: Kremlin Narratives Exploit Debate on Conscription Language Rules
Both the debate over restricting conscription to B1-level Estonian speakers and the dismissal of a Russian-language school director were seized upon, especially in pro-Kremlin online spaces, to portray Estonia’s language policies as discriminatory.
Read more
Monthly Reports
Estonia Monthly: Conscription Language Debate Reignites “Russophobia” Narratives
In December 2025, proposed language requirements for certain roles in Estonia’s conscription-based defence forces sparked renewed “Russophobia” narratives in Russian-language and pro-Kremlin online spaces. While critics framed the initiative as discriminatory toward Russian-speaking citizens, authorities emphasized operational safety, cohesion, and effective communication, highlighting ongoing tensions between integration, security, and minority rights.
Read more
Latvia Monthly: Pro-Kremlin Narratives Undermine Baltic Sovereignty
Domestic opposition populist politicians disseminated narratives of institutional persecution and Latvia being undemocratic. At the same time pro-Kremlin channels systematically inverted geopolitical responsibility, reframing Russian military threats as defensive responses to Baltic aggression and portraying NATO membership as hidden subjugation. Together, these narratives construct an alternative reality designed to delegitimize Baltic institutions, weaken NATO cohesion, and normalize Russian regional dominance by suggesting resistance is both futile and illegitimate.
Read more
Estonia Monthly: Bessedin’s Detention Fuels Pro-Kremlin Outrage
The detention of Oleg Bessedin by Estonia’s Internal Security Service (KAPO) in early November reignited intense debates about foreign influence operations and media pluralism. While authorities accuse Bessedin of cooperating with Russian intelligence-linked actors and amplifying sanctioned Kremlin propaganda, pro-Kremlin commentators framed his arrest as a politically motivated attack on Russian speakers in Estonia. The case has deepened existing tensions between national security concerns and narratives portraying Estonia as increasingly hostile toward dissenting Russian-language voices.
Read more
Latvia Monthly: Disinformation Peaks Ahead of Final Vote on Istanbul Convention Withdrawal
While Kremlin-aligned disinformation has long been present in Latvia’s information space, the more alarming development is how local politicians have brought these tactics into the center of mainstream politics, making conspiracy theories and fabricated threats core components of parliamentary debate. Conservative and populist politicians like oligarch Ainārs Šlesers now routinely claim the Istanbul Convention promotes “117 genders” and enables forced gender transitions for children, combining Russian-style narratives about Western moral decay with Trumpian manipulation tactics including personal ridicule, “Sorosist” conspiracies, and apocalyptic calls to “save Latvia.”
Read moreDon’t miss a story.
We publish stories that change laws, lives, minds and the world. Subscribe to our newsletter to get our investigations delivered to your inbox.