Skip to content

Latvia

Month 22 | June 2025

Latvia Monthly: Political Victimhood and Radical Messaging Fuel Tensions Between Communities

In June, Stability! party leader Aleksejs Roslikovs sparked controversy by declaring in Parliament, “There are more of us! We cannot be banned!” – a response to a nationalist proposal to restrict Russian language use. His remarks and viral social media posts were later amplified by pro-Kremlin media, highlighting how domestic tensions can fuel foreign propaganda.

by Martinš Hiršs
Aleksejs Roslikovs

Key Insights:

In early June, Stability! party leader Aleksejs Roslikovs ignited controversy by ending a parliamentary speech in Russian with, “There are more of us! We cannot be banned!” This was a response to a National Alliance proposal to limit Russian language use in public spaces. Though the proposal was ultimately rejected, its timing ahead of municipal elections revealed it as a political provocation. Roslikovs seized the moment, portraying himself as a defender of Russian speakers and using viral TikTok posts, some surpassing 2 million views, to mobilize support. The incident underscores a pattern of reciprocal radicalization, where nationalist and pro-Russian actors fuel division for political gain. The fallout quickly spread beyond Latvia, amplified by Kremlin-linked propaganda networks.

The main narratives were:

  • Latvia is Russophobic
  • Prosecution of Russian speakers

Overview of the Findings:

At the start of June, Stability! party leader Aleksejs Roslikovs sparked controversy by ending a parliamentary speech in Russian with the words: “There are more of us! We cannot be banned!” The remark was a response to a National Alliance proposal to restrict Russian language use in public spaces. Latvia’s State Security Service (VDD) launched criminal proceedings against Roslikovs for allegedly aiding Russia and inciting ethnic hatred.

The controversy was sparked by a declaration proposed by the National Alliance calling for restrictions on the use of Russian in public life, framed as addressing the Russification of Latvia during the Soviet occupation. While the declaration was ultimately rejected in Parliament, its timing – immediately before municipal elections – suggests it was a deliberate political provocation.

Both the National Alliance’s proposal and Roslikovs’ response were clearly linked to electoral strategy. The National Alliance has previously raised similar proposals before elections, knowing they will inflame ethnolinguistic tensions and appeal to nationalist voters. Roslikovs, in turn, exploited the backlash to mobilize his base, using social media virality to frame himself as the only authentic voice defending Russian speakers.

This dynamic illustrates reciprocal radicalization, where Latvian nationalists and Russian political actors escalate tensions by reacting to each other’s provocations. Each side feeds the narrative of being under siege, increasing ethnolinguistic division and enabling racial actors on both ends to dominate public discourse.

This pattern reveals how populist and nationalist actors benefit from societal division, even if their proposals are not meant to be enacted. The cost is increasing societal fragmentation and vulnerability to foreign influence. The proposal from the National Alliance and Roslikov’s response were widely repeated across Russia and the Russian propaganda network. Roslikovs’ posts on TikTok achieved unprecedented reach, with over 2 million views per video. These messages were widely shared beyond Latvia, and picked up by pro-Kremlin propaganda outlets, serving as an example of how internal political incidents in democratic countries can be exploited by hostile foreign actors.

Story of the Month:

Rising Ethnolinguistic Tensions in Latvia

Recent events in Latvia have triggered a sharp rise in ethnolinguistic tensions, revealing deep political divides and a troubling intersection between domestic populism and Kremlin-aligned narratives. At the center of the current controversy is Aleksejs Roslikovs, leader of the Stability! party, whose disruptive parliamentary behavior and viral social media posts have created a national and international stir.

These events allowed Roslikovs to craft a victimization narrative, positioning himself as a heroic defender of Latvia’s Russian-speaking minority. Following his expulsion from Parliament and the opening of a criminal investigation by the State Security Service (VDD) for “providing assistance to the aggressor state” and “inciting ethnic hatred,” Roslikovs pivoted to TikTok and Telegram.

His social media messaging casts the state’s legal actions as political persecution. Dramatic language that he is “willing to give his life,” or that he is “at home, but a stranger,” was used to portray himself as a martyr resisting an oppressive Latvian state. This populist rhetoric resonates strongly with Russian-speaking audiences, turning state scrutiny into political capital and generating massive engagement online.

Furthermore, the response from Latvian nationalists has been over the top. Physical intimidation and public threats against Roslikovs, such as a doll hung from a post with a threatening message calling for the death of Roslikovs and a derogatory banner displayed at a football game targeting Roslikovs, have been integrated into his broader narrative. He characterizes these acts as evidence of organized extremist activity against him. He is using terms like “controlled organizations” to suggest a broader conspiracy against him.

While these incidents may not be centrally orchestrated, their symbolism and emotional impact serve to reinforce polarization, suggesting increased ethnolinguistic tensions, where both sides feel victimized and aggrieved.

Monthly Reports
Tallinn

Estonia Monthly: The Return of the ‘Russian Card’ Ahead of Municipal Elections

June 2025

German Brigade

Lithuania Monthly: German Brigade Arrival Triggers Wave of Kremlin-Backed Disinformation

May 2025

Glorija Grevcova

Latvia Monthly: The Rise of the Alliance of Young Latvians

May 2025

victory day

Estonia Monthly: Victory Day Sparks Disinformation Surge in Narva and Tallinn

May 2025

Vilnius

Lithuania Monthly: Real Estate Tax Protest Becomes a Tool for Kremlin's Disinformation

April 2025

Saeimas

Latvia Monthly: Intensifying Pre-Election Rhetoric

April 2025

Estonia Monthly: Narva's Mayor Faces Threats Amid Rising Tensions

April 2025

Pabradė

Lithuania Monthly: Kremlin Media Exploits U.S. Military Incident to Undermine NATO

March 2025

Riga

Latvia Monthly: Kremlin Propaganda Paints a Puppet and a Provocateur

March 2025

Tallinn

Estonia Monthly: Citizenship Reform and Church Bill Fuel Pro-Kremlin Narratives

March 2025

Don't miss a story.

We publish stories that change laws, lives, minds and the world. Subscribe to our newsletter to get our investigations delivered to your inbox.