Reports
Latvia Weekly: Pro-Kremlin Narratives Mock Baltic Security and Undermine NATO Credibility
The pro-Kremlin "Antifascists of Pribaltics" channel uses mockery and logical inversions to delegitimize Baltic security efforts, falsely claiming Latvia is in NATO, because Russia has “leased” it out and portraying defensive military measures as delusional provocation. By systematically undermining confidence in Baltic defense policies and independence, the channel aims to weaken NATO cohesion and increase Baltic vulnerability to Russian pressure.
Read more
Latvia Weekly: Inversion Tactics Used to Portray Latvia as the Aggressor
The pro-Kremlin "Antifascists of Pribaltics" channel systematically inverted geopolitical reality by reframing European security warnings as warmongering aggression while portraying Russia as a passive victim of Baltic hostility. Through distortion, false equivalences, and sarcasm, the channel delegitimizes Baltic governments' security policies and reduces economic dependence on Russia, serving Kremlin interests by undermining NATO cohesion and Baltic confidence in their own independence.
Read more
Latvia Weekly: Local Actors Amplify Stories of Oppression and Resistance
Local populist or Kremlin-aligned political actors painted a picture themselves as persecuted victims of an oppressive establishment while positioning their controversial stances as vindicated common sense. This narrative delegitimizes the state and portrays their radical populism as righteous resistance against systemic persecution.
Read more
Latvia Weekly: Opposition Leaders Portray Themselves as Victims of Systemic Bias
Two Latvian opposition politicians have constructed narratives of systematic persecution, with Rosļikovs framing his prosecution for pro-Russian activities as evidence of disproportionate punishment for defending minority rights, while Ainars Šlesers alleges state-funded media bias that promotes government-aligned causes while suppressing dissent. Both narratives challenge the legitimacy of Latvia's institutions by portraying courts and public media as politicized tools of the ruling coalition rather than neutral arbiters, using claims of selective justice to position themselves as martyrs and mobilize support among audiences suspicious of institutional fairness.
Read moreShowing 1 to 4 of 143 results
Don't miss a story.
We publish stories that change laws, lives, minds and the world. Subscribe to our newsletter to get our investigations delivered to your inbox.