Skip to content

Reports

4
Aleksejs Roslikovs
November 10th - November 16th, 2025 by Martinš Hiršs

Latvia Weekly: Local Actors Amplify Stories of Oppression and Resistance

Local populist or Kremlin-aligned political actors painted a picture themselves as persecuted victims of an oppressive establishment while positioning their controversial stances as vindicated common sense. This narrative delegitimizes the state and portrays their radical populism as righteous resistance against systemic persecution.

Read more
6
Limp Bizkit
November 10th - November 16th, 2025 by Dmitri Teperik and Artur Aukon

Estonia Weekly: Limp Bizkit Concert Cancellation Sparks Nationwide Debate

Pro-Kremlin online voices commented on the wave of school-related bomb threats and extended their criticism to the heated debate over the cancellation of a Limp Bizkit concert due to the band’s pro-Putin sympathies.

Read more
10
Gabrielius Landsbergis
November 3rd - November 9th, 2025 by Urtė Andriukaitytė

Lithuania Weekly: Disinformation Targets Landsbergis and Exploits Belarus Balloon Incidents

Pro-Kremlin media mocked Gabrielius Landsbergis over his recent human rights award and framed him as a danger to Lithuania’s interests. Parallel narratives dramatized the Belarusian balloon incidents, claiming the government manufactured hysteria to justify restrictive policies. These coordinated themes seek to portray Lithuania as insecure, manipulated, and poorly governed.

Read more
4
Roslikovs
November 3rd - November 9th, 2025 by Martinš Hiršs

Latvia Weekly: Opposition Leaders Portray Themselves as Victims of Systemic Bias

Two Latvian opposition politicians have constructed narratives of systematic persecution, with Rosļikovs framing his prosecution for pro-Russian activities as evidence of disproportionate punishment for defending minority rights, while Ainars Šlesers alleges state-funded media bias that promotes government-aligned causes while suppressing dissent. Both narratives challenge the legitimacy of Latvia's institutions by portraying courts and public media as politicized tools of the ruling coalition rather than neutral arbiters, using claims of selective justice to position themselves as martyrs and mobilize support among audiences suspicious of institutional fairness.

Read more

Don't miss a story.

We publish stories that change laws, lives, minds and the world. Subscribe to our newsletter to get our investigations delivered to your inbox.